Unintended Bid
East opens 3H. West asks for aces, rebids 5S, and then calls the Director claiming an unintended bid, wanting to stop in 5H. E-W have no agreement for 5S here.
Q1 Does the 3H opening set trumps ? so that 5S could indeed be ruled unintended ...
Q2 Given that the Director call created UI, can West correct to 6H ? (West has a spade void.)
Q3 If you allow 6H and it is a top board, do you adjust ?
| WEST | EAST |
 AQJT2 |
- |
 K6 |
AJT7542 |
 AJ84 |
T93 |
 Q7 |
KT6 |
thanks
Latest Posts on this Thread
- Johan Forsberg10 Apr 2021 at 11:59AM
I don't understand how this exactly happened. I want to bid 2H, OK I grab some more bidding cards than intended (happens all the time), then after I place it on the table don't I look at what I have put on the table? I guess it can happen that I grab a clearly thicker bunch of cards, place it, and because it's in the same denomination, I don't notice it until much later. I'm not saying that N is lying, just that she should check online casino real money nz.
- GILES HANCOCK10 Apr 2021 at 09:14PM
Bidding PAD
- NICK WHITTEN11 Apr 2021 at 05:08PM
I would rule 3S as unintended
It looks quite irrational to meAnd I wouldn't put any constraints on partners actions following that
What UI (if any) does not demonstrably favour bidding 6HI don't think the director should adjust in the event of a call he allowed to make being a good result for the offending side unless Law 72C or Law 23C kicks in
You need to be logged in to reply to threads.
Click here to log in.
Click here to log in.
