All News
Daily Bridge in New Zealand
The Problem Solver.
That’s a brave, maybe even foolish, statement to make about a bid but the suggestion today may help. So, what would you bid as North in this position?
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
Maybe you wish you were playing the Jacoby 2NT where that bid shows a game-force hand with 4+ support for opener’s suit..but you are not. So, you bid your second suit and after East’s intervention and without any knowledge of your own spade holding, your partner shows a strong hand with long spades. What now?
There would seem to be 3 options, other than a simple punt to 6, which seems unwise. Any form of Blackwood or indeed Gerber would not be very satisfactory. Your partner can hold 2 aces or key-cards and you still do not know whether you should be in slam or just in game.
You could try 4 as long as your partner recognises this as a cue-bid and not long diamonds. If they do, then you get across the fact you are interested in a spade slam and have no control in the club suit (the suit you by-passed). If partner can cue a control (A, K or shortage) in hearts, then you could be heading for slam.
There is, though, another way and although that does take you to the 5-level, it does highlight the real issue. Traditionally, the jump to 5 of one’s agreed suit (obviously, this only applies to a major suit) asked partner to bid slam with good trumps. In an uncontested auction, you may still wish to play that. However, where the opponents intervene, it has a more useful question.
A bid of 5 by North asks opener to bid to the 6 level with any control in the opponent’s suit and to pass with none. With complete control, say singleton ace, AK doubleton or a void, the answer is 5NT and the partnership can explore grand possibilities. Normally, with one control, just bid 6 of the trump suit.
There is a danger that the partnership could be off a side-suit ace (here A) as well as two losers in the danger suit. Yet, the 3 bid shows a strong hand and that risk is probably not as great as one would imagine.
So, how would our 5 have worked?
South Deals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
All pass |
|
A pretty solid 11 tricks with no chance of any more when West leads their ace and East encourages.
Half of the 14 North/South pairs tried slam with 2 being successful after receiving the Q lead. Indeed, only the other 5 in slam received the A lead.
So, will you gamble….
Or take a more scientific approach?
(Also, you may not always be in a position to cue-bid, e.g. after an opposition pre-empt, say 3 then 4 from partner so that your only option may be the raise to 5 of your partner’s trump suit.)
You pays your money and some days you will get away with making a slam like this one. Using conventions like the jump here to 5 may in the long run improve your results.
Richard Solomon