All News
Daily Bridge in New Zealand
Nice hand… but where to go?
Just for once your partner seems to have a decent overcall…and your hand is not without merit. Yet, the two hands do not seem to gel very well. What to do next?
North Deals |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
? |
|
|
|
Much of the debate seems to revolve around what shape our partner has, bearing in mind they have both black suits. They have not used 2 Michaels (5 spades and 5+ minor) and are therefore not 5-5 in the black suits. We do have one abstention because East did not double, the bid he and others would make with only 4 clubs:
Stephen Blackstock “East’s auction doesn’t appear to make sense. With 5+-5+ in the blacks, as 3 suggests, why no two-suited overcall? With less shape, why no takeout double of 2? (Even with 5125 and honour x in diamonds, a second-round double is probably better than 3).
Unless I have misjudged the situation (perfectly possible of course) you are asking the Panel to guess what East is doing, unassisted by prior actions they can rely upon. I don’t think that is fair.”
Agreeing with Stephen about double is:
Pam Livingston “3NT: 3 is a free bid and shows a 5- card suit and likely extra values. With 5224 partner would double rather than bid 3. My club holding is good and I have hearts stopped.”
Here’s one interpretation of East’s hand:
Michael Ware “3NT: Partner appears to be 6115 as he/she didn't Michael's or double 2 for take-out (maybe 5215 outside our agreed Michaels range?). We have too much to pass but 5 seems too much with only A and only 3 clubs to take care of all partner's spade losers.”
Yet, others see 3 as only a 4-card suit:
Andy Braithwaite “3NT: Partner’s failure to Michael’s initially suggests 64 or more likely a stronger 54 hand which makes 3NT a viable option- partner's free bid at the 3 level may indicate a partial diamond fit such as Kx. That would give 3NT a real shot so that is my bid.”
Nigel Kearney “3NT: Our 2 was constructive but need not be this strong. Partner has bid 3 voluntarily and appears to have only 5-4 shape as Michaels was not used so is likely to have significant extra values. A mediocre 5224 with 12 HCP is unlikely to have bothered introducing the club suit. Even so it's a close decision between pass and 3NT, but we're vul at IMPS and partner will fairly often have either Kx or heart help.”
I would have thought with a decent hand and Kx, our partner might have chosen a 3 ask rather than 3.
Is our heart hold good enough for 3NT? It’s a maybe. We are too strong now to pass. There is still an alternative, whatever it means…
Bruce Anderson “Double: 3NT is the alternative but 9 tricks may be problematic after a heart lead. It could well be partner’s hand was improved by my bidding 2 and we have a diamond fit; partner did not use Michaels, so his shape could be 5134.
On the other hand, the fact partner did not bid an immediate 3 but instead bid 3 suggests he/she does not have that hand. It is a close- run thing but I am doubling for penalties, notwithstanding the vulnerability.
The defence could go well if the K is in the South hand. Partner should be good for the 1 overcall and the 3 voluntary bid, meaning it is likely they hold the A. We may get a cross ruff going to declarer’s detriment.”
or:
Michael Cornell “Double: in theory for take-out when they have bid and supported their suit.
Would love to hear 3NT but this is unlikely but I will bid 3NT myself over 3 which can surely only be a single stop.
I do not think partner has five clubs (no Michaels?) unless he has six spades so if he is 6-5 he will bid 4 over 3NT and I do not think I have enough to raise.”
I like Michael’s “in theory” because I think it rather denies black suit support or long strong diamonds….and that therefore, it is leaning more towards penalising. Penalising 3 (and remember South’s heart support came only because of North’s 2 rebid) was the theoretically correct action though in practice 3NT looked a good shot on the day:
North Deals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West |
North |
East |
South |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
? |
|
|
|
With no entry to the South hand, against 3x, West can score 2 trump tricks either by ruffing or naturally. Indeed, on J lead, the defence will score A, A, two spade ruffs and two top clubs for +300.
That’s a good score for East-West if North finds a spade lead to 3NT. That will allow the defence to score 6 tricks. However, if any other suit is led, there will be 10 relatively comfortable tricks for West.
So, how would you interpret 3 and a double of 3? Would you have been writing down +630. Let’s be optimistic!
Ukraine Update
On behalf of the Auckland Bridge Club, Anthony Hopkins would like to thank all those who took part in the club’s two fund-raisers about a month ago. The final figure raised for UNICEF was $7,700, a great effort.
Richard Solomon