All News

Daily Bridge in New Zealand

Too aggressive?

Over and Under Bidding.

Today, we seem to feature a bit of both. Throw into the mix the need to record as high-scoring a game as possible because we are playing Pairs and we have both controversy and perhaps riskiness in the search for our best place to declare the board. 

Bridge in NZ.pngnz map.jpg

     
South Deals
N-S Vul
 
N
W   E
S
   
 
A J
Q
A 9 7 6 5
A K 10 8 6
West North East South
      1 
Pass 1  Pass 3 
Pass 3  Pass ?

 

3Club-small is natural and Game Forcing. Where to from here?

I have to admit I was surprised at the Panel’s reaction to our 3Club-small bid. Listen to these comments:

Nigel Kearney ”3NT: This is the most likely game and with so much in spades I need to bid it myself. There is no guarantee partner even has three diamonds. He could have Spade-small10xx Heart-smallAxxxx Diamond-smallJx Club-smallQxx or similar. 3Club-small looks like an overbid to me. We would be better placed now if we had just rebid 2Club-small then invited with 3Club-small after a 2Diamond-small preference.”

Stephen Blackstock “3NT: If this is the right game, it looks as if it will be better from my side. Close to abstain, as 3Club-small is poorly judged – the values are marginal and my first suit is very weak. While it is just possible 2Club-small will be passed and a game missed (opposite four clubs, a singleton diamond and a working card), more often 3Club-small will get us too high, or, as here, pre-empts our auction when we badly need the room.”

Jump shifts by opener are certainly not space-savers. However, I would think sometimes we just have to make them to tell our partner how strong we are. If our singleton heart is not the best use of two hcp, it is in our partner’s suit and should be carrying some weight there. Meanwhile, our diamond suit may not be that strong but our club suit is much better. Even if we survive the risk of 2Club-small being passed out, we would seem to have virtually lost the opportunity for our partner to drive to a slam.

Yet, 3Club-small is not the only bid which was questioned. What does partner’s 3Diamond-small mean? We saw Nigel Kearney above refer to the fact that it does not even guarantee three cards, let alone a possible four.

Bruce Anderson “3NT: I don’t want to be in a tight slam at Pairs and bidding 3NT could mean this game is played from the right side. Partnership understanding is required here; is 3Diamond-small a strong responding hand, not wanting to take up bidding space unnecessarily, or is 3Diamond-small a minimum responding hand with only 3 card support?

Partner can pass my bid of 3NT, or with strong diamond support and a slam going hand, bid 4Diamond-small, after which I will cue bid 4Spade-small. If partner then bids a small slam that should be a make, and if partner has golden cards a grand might be bid.

More optimism here though questioning the meaning of 3Diamond-small is fair. I questioned Stephen Blackstock a little further and he commented:

Stephen Blackstock 3Diamond-small could be on xx. 3Diamond-small does not improve your hand at all. And if you think the Panel should wander off into the never-never, with no fit and having overbid already, I couldn’t disagree more strongly. 3Spade-small from North would show something in spades, but uncertainty as to whether it is sufficient to base 3NT. Or it might turn out to be an advance cue. It is not a punt on the likes of Spade-smallxxx.”

As Bruce commented, some partnership agreement is needed here. Certainly, it should be over to our partner to advance beyond 3NT and they alone know why they bid 3Diamond-small. However, with a differing view of the 4th suit forcing 3Spade-small is:

Andy Braithwaite “3Spade-small: fourth suit forcing- need partner to hold a spade honour to play 3NT at Pairs.”

though we seem to have one and a half honours in the suit ourselves, or so says:

 Michael Cornell “3NT: I have more than bid my hand already – if we are going anywhere, it is over to partner. It is important for my hand to play any NTs as just eg. Spade-small10xx would give us two stops.”

and conscious that in Pairs, one does not always reach the safest game:

 

Peter Newell “3NT: Its Pairs, and I like the lead coming up to my Spade-smallAJ doubleton and we don’t have much room, so keep it simple.  It’s true that 5Diamond-small or 4Heart-small could be better, but I figure North will often rebid 3Heart-small if his hearts were good enough for 4Heart-small, and while 5Diamond-small is likely better if partner has no  Spade-small10,Q,K or length and has good diamond support, I favour what is practical and simple.”  

 

So, we are accused of over-bidding though there is also the maxim of playing with the field. Partner had a 10 count with (nearly) adequate diamonds. 3NT was the best scoring though not the safest game. 11 tricks were very safe in 5D… for a poorish match-point score!

 
South Deals
N-S Vul
8 7
A J 6 2
Q J 10 2
Q 7 4
Q 10 9 6 5
8 7 5 4
8 4 3
2
 
N
W   E
S
 
K 4 3 2
K 10 9 3
K
J 9 5 3
 
A J
Q
A 9 7 6 5
A K 10 8 6
West North East South
      1 
Pass 1  Pass 3 
Pass 3  Pass ?

In a mixed field of 32 tables, three pairs bid to 6Diamond-small and 10 in the rock-solid 5Diamond-small while another 10 tried their luck in 3NT. I did say “mixed” as there were a variety of other contracts, mainly part-score.

fortune favoured the brave.jpg

This time, fortune favoured the slammers and 3NT players. I am not sure whether Nigel Kearney and Stephen Blackstock would have been that much better placed after their 2Club-small response. North would have produced a non-forcing 3Diamond-small though 5Diamond-small would be more and 3NT less likely then as North would have more cards in the red suits and thus less in one of the black suits.

In 6Diamond-small, after a spade lead, South could advance the Heart-smallQ to see if West would be kind enough to cover. When they do not, it is down to the position of the Diamond-smallK and like those in 3NT, the South players would have breathed a huge sigh of relief at its quick appearance. Tough, perhaps for those in 5Diamond-small but that’s Pairs for you.

 

 

Prove Partner right on Jan's Day?

 
South Deals
Both Vul
10 8
A Q 10
Q 6 5 2
7 6 3 2
   
N
W   E
S
   
 
K 7 6
K J 8 7 6
A J
A K 8
West North East South
      1 
Pass 2  Pass 3 NT
Pass 4  All pass  

 

It’s a tough choice deciding whether to play in 3NT or 4 of a major with a 5-3 major fit and two flattish hands. North chose 4Heart-small here. North-South were playing 5-card major openings. You are playing Pairs.

 

West led Diamond-smallT which went round to your jack. Plan the play.

 

Richard Solomon

Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • TECT.jpg