All News
Daily Bridge in New Zealand
Which way to 12 tricks?
In a vacuum (it does happen once every ten years at the bridge table), you seem to have a very straightforward assignment with the hands below. If you can prevent the trump queen from scoring a trick, then you will have just one loser…and maybe even should you lose to that major queen, if you can bring home the heart suit for four tricks, you will still be fine. Sounds a good contract then? There’s only one problem. This is not that "once in a decade" happening. There is plenty more information to digest before you decide on your line.
South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
West | North | East | South |
1 ♠ | |||
3 ♣ | 3 ♥ | Pass | 4 ♠ |
Pass | 5 ♠ | Pass | 6 ♠ |
All pass |
Your 1 is a limited opening with less than 16 hcp. 3 is a weak jump with 5 specifically suggesting South bids slam with a control in the enemy suit. You oblige and receive 2 lead. What next?
That 5 bid is a handy one when you are thinking about slam in a major suit when the opposition have been in the bidding and you have two or more small cards in their suit. North was very interested in a spade slam with clubs being the real danger. Thus, the raise to 5 of the trump suit asks for help in that suit, a situation when cue-bidding may not help.
Yet, West did not lead their suit. They chose 2 which looks very much like a singleton. If so, your line seems fairly clear in that you can draw trumps, discard one club on the K and take a ruffing finesse through East, thus disposing of the other small club on the established 10 (or discard if East does not cover J). So, how are the spades breaking? We must assume that West has at least one trump or else why try for the ruff? At the table our declarer decided to play A and a spade to the jack, intending to play as indicated above.
Poisoned ivy,a
Greek gift?
Alas, this line was not a success:
South Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West | North | East | South |
1 ♠ | |||
3 ♣ | 3 ♥ | Pass | 4 ♠ |
Pass | 5 ♠ | Pass | 6 ♠ |
All pass |
West won their queen and now played K. East used their 10 to good effect for the defence. Had the K been led at trick 1, South would still have been left with a tricky spade guess after an initial ruff. Had they guessed right (play AK), then the contract would have made.
South was unlucky that West had just bid 3 with a decent looking seven-card club suit though perhaps with a ruff imminent (though not the ruff that actually happened), playing top trumps is often preferable to taking any trump finesse. It certainly was on the above deal.
However, it seems strange that West led a singleton heart which only works when their partner holds the ace. Holding the Q, the K lead seems more normal scoring perhaps two tricks when a declarer takes the wrong view in trumps. Had East held QTxx (which is more likely after a K lead) then a spade finesse is required.
This board was played during one of last weekend’s on-line test matches between New Zealand and Australia. It produced a healthy swing for Australia whose pair played in the safety of game.
3-2 to the Kiwis
5 matches in Open, Women, Mixed, Senior and Youth categories and we came out on top in three of the five. Matches were over 6 x 16 board sets on Real Bridge with the New Zealand players stationed at the Auckland and Christchurch Bridge Clubs. In summary:
Open New Zealand 220 Australia 162
Matt Brown – Michael Whibley Peter Gill – Sartaj Hans
Nick Jacob- GeO Tislevoll Michael Courtney – Paul Wyer
Martin Reid – Peter Newell
Derek Evennett (npc)
New Zealand won four of the six sets, most significantly the second by 36imps to record a win in astrongly contested match.
Women New Zealand 221 Australia 116
Shirley Newton – Jenny Wilkinson Jessica Brake – Susan Humphries
Jan Alabaster – Pam Livingston Marianne Bookallil – Jodi Tutty
Andi Boughey – Carol Richardson Giselle Mundell – Rena Kaplan
Kris Wooles (npc)
New Zealand hit the lead after set 2 and never looked back winning all but the first set, including a large 44 imp win in set 4.
Mixed
New Zealand 201 Australia 160
Jenny Millington – Barry Jones Leone Fuller – Trevor Fuller
Liz Fisher – Blair Fisher Pele Rankin – Stephen Fischer
Jo Simpson – Sam Simpson Tania Lloyd – Hugh Grosvenor
Grant Jarvis (npc)
The Kiwis were 74 imps up with 32 boards to play. 32 of the lead disappeared in set 5 though there the come-back ended with the last 16 boards being just about even.
Seniors
New Zealand 165 Australia 238
Tom Jacob – Brian Mace Robert Krochmalik – Paul Lavings
Julie Atkinson – Pat Carter Stephen Burgess – Gabi Lorentz
Alan Grant – John Skipper George Kozakos – George Smolanko
Allan Morris (npc)
It was Australia all the way, certainly from the time they won the second set by 38 imps.
Youth
New Zealand 168 Australia 320
Jack James – Leon Meier Andrew Spooner- Renee Cooper
Zachary Yan – Kevin Hu Jamie Thompson – David Gue
Bertie Morgan – George Bartley
Sam Coutts (npc)
The first half was close despite a huge 43 imp win to Australia in the first set. However, on Day 2, Australia piled on 191 imps, far too many for the less experienced Kiwis.
Do you double? What do you lead?
Two questions for Jan’s Day:
West Deals Both Vul |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
West | North | East | South |
1 NT | 2 ♦ | Pass | 2 ♥ |
Pass | 3 ♦ | Pass | 4 ♣ |
Pass | 4 ♥ | Pass | 4 NT |
Pass | 5 ♦ | Pass | 6 ♥ |
? |
The bidding is natural with 5 showing one ace. Your opening shows 12-14.
Richard Solomon