All News
Daily Bridge in New Zealand
All that Glitters…
A nice- looking hand, great potential, two good suits….and, wait a moment. Someone has opened the bidding in one of them…but it is not your partner. What should you do?
South Deals E-W Vul |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
West | North | East | South |
1 ♠ | |||
? |
It is possible you were not expecting South to say that. One option is to pass, in as normal tempo as you can (no “Stop Card” is required for a 1 opening!) and hope your partner produces a double, though the vulnerability is not really in your favour even if you can do damage to this contract.
If you are going to bid, double seems not quite appropriate with a severe disliking for hearts. 1NT too has its obvious flaw…which leaves:
Matt Brown “2. I've never really been that afraid of overcalling with 5 of their suit. Partner can contribute ruffing value, and my hand and clubs are strong enough that I'm not going to get penalised or anything. If partner can raise, we've got pretty good chances for game now on a spade lead.”
You might not be penalised, Matt, but on some days others might!
Peter Newell “2: These hands are difficult to bid, and they usually get even more difficult by passing. So, I would like to show my unbid suit and that I have some values. If the opponents were vulnerable, I would be prepared to pass but here I want get into the auction quickly and at a safe level.”
Michael Cornell “2: A very clever “trap” if I pass. We would well and truly “trap ourselves” ( I would overcall a heavy 2.)
However, pass did receive some support:
Nigel Kearney “Pass on the first round. With length in their suit, a pass initially tends to work out best. Either they get into trouble or we avoid trouble.”
Bruce Anderson, Stephen Blackstock and Pam Livingston, too, are all first- round passers. 2 seems safe enough as an overcall though Nigel Kearney is not so sure. We asked the Panel what they would do on the second round of bidding had they passed the first time because, had they passed, the bidding would have proceeded:
West North East South
1
Pass 1NT Pass 2
?
Again, we have differing views from the quite satisfied:
Bruce Anderson "Pass: (again): I can see no rational alternative; 3 could find partner with club length, but it could also go for a number. I do not intend to take that risk.”
to the slightly aggravated:
Michael Cornell “Double: Now all I can do is Double and await developments-e.g. if hearts get raised, I can double again, but if partner has 5 reasonable hearts or even 6, we have them on toast. It could work out well.”
The debate between these two would be quite interesting especially when you get to see the actual four hands. With some premonition about what could happen is:
Peter Newell “Double: If I pass first time, then the auction becomes more difficult in some ways as it is more dangerous to enter the auction at a higher level on a hand maybe with a misfit and likely bad breaks. I will double with some trepidation (and might not against sound bidders i.e. full opening and full 1NT response).
Clearly this is take-out, strong (I wouldn’t enter the auction vulnerable on the 2nd round otherwise) and must have spade length and short hearts. I don’t mind too much if partner passes, but I’m nervous about partner having a shape like 2542 and with weakish hearts and could bid 3. However, I’ll take my chances with double…but I think bidding the first time would have been preferable.”
While not staying silent forever are:
Stephen Blackstock "Double: 3 would be dangerous and foolish. It might be a very bad contract with 3 a make. If partner has a poor diamond suit (four card or bad five) and club tolerance (xxx or better) I expect him to scramble with 2NT, so we should reach our best fit. And if we defend 2x, it might well go very badly for declarer.
Nigel Kearney “Double: for take-out. This doesn't suggest my full strength and shape but is the most descriptive call. I'm happy to defend if partner has hearts and if partner chooses to bid 3, that figures to play better than 3 most of the time.”
All of what Nigel says is true though there are heart suits with which partner might like to defend at the 2 level with and others which they might not. There was to be little joy for those who overcalled 2 first time or who defended 2x this time. That is not to say that East would have passed 2x though the only safe resting place would not be high on East’s choice of contracts, the opposition’s first bid suit at the 2 -level
South Deals E-W Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
West | North | East | South |
1 ♠ | |||
Pass | 1 NT | Pass | 2 ♥ |
Dbl | Pass | ? |
Michael Cornell (and others) “heavy” 2 overcall would have received a re-opening double from South (“ The opposition are not the only one with a good hand!") and a hopeful pass from North. With East having a couple of clubs, it is doubtful they would look to escape in a red suit by redoubling. West would manage four or five tricks but that would not be a happy result for West.
Meanwhile, with West unable to lead a trump, there is even the possibility of South making 10 tricks in their heart contract with some admirable cross-ruffing.
On some days, like when the North cards were in the East seat, the club overcall would have worked out very well though this was one of those days when silence was indeed golden, twice over. A score-up in a Teams match might have gone “+170” which did not negate the -500 or -800 at the other table.
Unlucky? Certainly. Our heading’s unsaid words certainly rang true this time.
Tarnished gold!
Avoiding a Defensive Disaster
West Deals None Vul |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
West | North | East | South |
Dummy | You | ||
1 ♦ | Dbl | 1 ♠ | 4 ♥ |
All pass |
It looks like North made a pretty light-weight take-out double and that the final contract might not be an easy make. Your partner leads either A or K (We will give you the clue that they have them both.). Using your own method of following suit, which card would you play to trick 1?
Richard Solomon