All News

Daily Bridge in New Zealand

        C7.jpg 

The tale of two singleton black 7’s!

At two of the four tables in the recent Mixed Trial, East- West made their contract of 5D, once doubled and once with an overtrick. Should this be so? Let’s see what you would do as declarer in this situation:

Bridge in NZ.png nz map.jpg

West Deals
Both Vul

Spade-small

J 6 5

Heart-small

7 5

Diamond-small

K Q 10

Club-small

K 9 6 5 2

   

N

W

 

E

S

   
 

Spade-small

7

Heart-small

A 8

Diamond-small

A 9 8 7 3 2

Club-small

A J 10 3

 

West

North

East

South

1 Heart-small

Pass

3 Heart-small

4 Diamond-small

4 Heart-small

5 Diamond-small

All pass

 

You may criticise West (when you see their hand) for bidding 4Heart-small. 1Heart-small promised at least a 5 card suit and 3Heart-small was pre-emptive. That bid encouraged North to bid 5Diamond-small. They may have done so had West passed 4Diamond-small.

West led Spade-smallK and East followed with Spade-small8, a count card, with the defence playing reverse signals. At trick 2, West switched to the Heart-smallK. Declarer won and drew trumps in three rounds, West starting off with 3 diamonds. After playing Heart-small2 at trick 2, East discarded Heart-small3 and a low spade.  Where to go from here?

This deal is interesting in the defence and play to 5Diamond-small and the defence should West be allowed to play in 4Heart-small. At one of the other tables, West did indeed bid and make 4Heart-small. Let’s check out the 4 hands:

West Deals
Both Vul

Spade-small

J 6 5

Heart-small

7 5

Diamond-small

K Q 10

Club-small

K 9 6 5 2

Spade-small

A K Q 2

Heart-small

K Q J 10 4

Diamond-small

J 5 4

Club-small

7

 

N

W

 

E

S

 

Spade-small

10 9 8 4 3

Heart-small

9 6 3 2

Diamond-small

6

Club-small

Q 8 4

 

Spade-small

7

Heart-small

A 8

Diamond-small

A 9 8 7 3 2

Club-small

A J 10 3

 

West

North

East

South

1 Heart-small

Pass

3 Heart-small

4 Diamond-small

4 Heart-small

5 Diamond-small

All pass

 

Were you defending a small slam holding both a side-suit ace along with a singleton in another side-suit, it would almost always be incorrect to lead your singleton after cashing your ace. Logically, if partner does hold the ace opposite your singleton, you are most likely to beat the contract by going passive. The lead of a singleton usually carries a great risk as it can destroy partner’s honour holding in the suit.

It is the same here. The switch to the club singleton was both extremely dangerous and of course, there was an alternative Heart-smallK switch. If the defence had a club trick, it would seem they would make it along with a heart trick. The club switch here proved immediately fatal for the defence.

Of course, West had deduced their partner had an odd number of spades. Where that was three, West needed to continue that suit. Yet, declarer wins, draws trumps and concedes a club, making 11 tricks. So, West here did well to switch, but not to the Club-small7 as now South makes an overtrick.

Making game..or not!

So, Heart-smallK switch beats 5Diamond-small? Well, if declarer wins and plays the top two clubs after drawing trumps, then 5Diamond-small will go down a trick. Should that be the case?

Back to South who received the Spade-smallK lead and Heart-smallK switch. They should certainly draw three rounds of trumps and then should take stock. They too should realise that the lead of a king against a high level contract (the 5 level or higher) often/ maybe always asks for count not attitude. South knows West started with 5 hearts and therefore East with 4. Since West would have opened 1Spade-small had they been 5-5 in the majors, they should deduce that West had 4 spades and East 5.

So, since West started with 4 spades and 5 hearts and had 3 confirmed diamonds, it should become much clearer how to play the club suit. So small to Club-smallK and then finesse? No way! That would block the club suit and all the good counting would be for nothing. South must play Club-smallJ (or Club-small10) to the Club-smallK and then finesse, preserving Club-small3 as the way to get to dummy and discard the losing heart…. making an overtrick! Yes! Great counting and play. Let’s hope the declarer in 5Diamond-small who made the overtrick did indeed do that rather than being “given” the contract by West playing their singleton at trick 2.

The other black singleton

What then of the table where 4Heart-small made? That just should not have happened after Diamond-smallK lead from North. The singleton diamond in dummy would be a big disappointment to South. The winning defence, though, is in their hands and should not be left to North to guess. South should overtake with Diamond-smallA at trick 1 and switch to their singleton Spade-small7. Yes, this time such a switch would be necessary.

Either North has a spade trick or else South can get a ruff. Spade-smallA wins the first trick and North plays Spade-small6. With Spade-small2 and Spade-small5 not in view, South may be able to read that as not encouraging (reverse attitude) signal. Thus, when West plays Heart-smallQ, South must take emergency action. The only way to partner’s hand would be in clubs and the only way to beat the contract is an immediate low club to partner’s Club-smallK. If West has 2 clubs, so much the better but getting the ruff is more important. Not guaranteed success and absolute failure when West’s club is the singleton king and North held Heart-smallK. Play the odds, though, and South would/ should be rewarded.

The ”cold” 5Diamond-small was missed but there should be no double game swing as there was in one match. It was mandatory to play one of the black 7's at trick 2 and mandatory for the other one to be withheld.

Richard Solomon

Go Back View All News Items

Our Sponsors
  • Tauranga City Council
  • TECT.jpg